Discussion (6)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Was Donald Trump right to fire White House press secretary Katie Zacharia after five days on the job? · 3 votes
- Was Donald Trump right to put the new Russia sanctions on hold just before they took effect? · 2 votes
- After an armed parent killed the attacker in the Bend, Oregon elementary school shooting, are armed citizens an effective way to stop school shootings? · 3 votes
- As the U.S. weighs new strikes on Iran, should a president announce in advance which military options he won't use? · 2 votes
I wouldn't say age limit, but maybe cognitive testing.
It's not fair and it misses the target; it would, for example, rule out Bernie Sanders yet keep John Fetterman eligible. Real people are unique, differences within groups outweigh differences between them, and that alone prevents these blanket-category judgments from ever being fair.
Agreed. I don't understand support for rules that limit our future choices. Do we really need protection from ourselves?
When it comes to public policy, "One Size Fits All" is as red as any flag can get.
If you say yes, what's the cutoff and why that number instead of just letting voters decide case by case every election.
I really dislike these AI driven engagement bait questions