Discussion (2)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Should the 2026 midterm results be treated as a verdict on President Trump? · 6 votes
- Were Missouri voters right to block the state's Republican-drawn congressional map? · 1 votes
- Were Idaho voters right to reject the ballot measure and keep the state's abortion ban? · 1 votes
- Should the U.S. fund a high-speed rail network? · 1 votes
The right to bear arms is federal by definition; the Second Amendment. The United States has a third world murder rate and an appalling record of mass shootings. Short of repealing the Second Amendment or modifying it (an approach I certainly would approve of) emplacing reasonable regulations is essential.
As with other regulation, there's the question of whether it's best set at the federal, state, or local level (or some might argue not at all, in cases). Is there a strong case to avoid a patchwork of standards here? I'm not sure there is.