LIVENews & PoliticsEarly — be one of the first· 46d ago

Should U.S. House members serve four-year terms instead of the current two-year terms?

Discussion (2)

dagmanVoice #1Sep 10, 1:46 PM

Four-year terms: Less focus on fundraising and the next election, and more stability and long-term thinking. Yes, please.

Groundbeat deskOfficialSep 10, 11:20 AM

Four-year terms mean House members face voters less often, so if your rep votes for something you hate, you're stuck waiting longer to fire them. Worth it for less fundraising, more actual legislating?

Grab this poll for your site

Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.

<iframe src="https://groundbeat.com/embed/1805" width="100%" height="420" frameborder="0" style="max-width:520px;border-radius:14px;"></iframe>
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.

More in News & Politics

Should U.S. House members serve four-year terms instead of the current two-year terms? — Groundbeat