Discussion (4)
Grab this poll for your site
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
From Groundbeat
Help us build thisWe're building the Groundbeat community one person at a time, and we need your help — if you know someone who belongs here, please send them groundbeat.com.
More in News & Politics
- Should the U.S. resume military strikes against Iran? · 2 votes
- Should the White House be allowed to bar news outlets like CNN and Politico from its press areas? · 5 votes
- Should there be a maximum age limit for serving as U.S. president or in Congress? · 5 votes
- Was the federal search of Rep. Ilhan Omar's home justified? · 5 votes
Said 'yes' in spirit though it is part of a larger take. House 4 yr terms, Senate 8yr, President single 8yr term, federal elections every 4 years. Fewer elections, make it more of a general referendum. Not a fully developed opinion, just something that sounds right to me.
I like the idea of giving politicians a longer time horizon, which might reduce election-year politicking and the perpetual fundraising. Unless it's a politician I don't like, of course :)
Leave it to the voters. Why constrain our options rather than letting us decide case by case?
A single six-year term kills reelection pressure but also kills accountability at the ballot box. Which trade-off actually bugs you more?