Should U.S. political campaigns be funded entirely with public money instead of private donations?
Debate continues over whether taxpayer-funded campaigns would reduce the influence of wealthy donors in U.S. elections.
Debate continues over whether taxpayer-funded campaigns would reduce the influence of wealthy donors in U.S. elections.
Votes cast anywhere this poll is embedded count toward the same live total.
If public money means candidates raise less, does that free them up or just cap ambition for the ones who'd outraise the limit anyway?